您当前的位置: 首页 > 资源详情

MedicalXpress,10月4日,Convalescent plasma futile as treatment for critical COVID-19 patients

编译者:YUTING发布时间:Oct 13, 2021点击量:36 来源栏目:最新研究

In the earliest days of the COVID-19 pandemic, the medical community turned to a century-old treatment: Take blood from recovered patients and give it to the sick. The hypothesis was that components in the so-called "convalescent plasma" that fought off the disease once could do it again, something that has worked in other diseases, such as Ebola.

Today, an international research team, which included University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine physician-scientists and UPMC patients, effectively put an end to that practice with a clinical trial that concluded convalescent plasma is "futile" as a COVID-19 treatment for most critically ill patients. The results are published in JAMA concurrent with presentation at the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine's annual meeting.

"There were biologically plausible reasons to turn to convalescent plasma early in the pandemic when hundreds of thousands of people were getting sick and treatments had yet to be discovered," said co-lead author Bryan McVerry, M.D., associate professor of pulmonary, allergy and critical care medicine at Pitt and a UPMC intensivist. "Unfortunately, it was either being administered outside of clinical trials or in trials that weren't focused on critically ill patients, slowing our ability to see if it actually worked. Finally, with these results, we can put an end to using convalescent plasma for our sickest COVID-19 patients and focus on treatments that we know work, as well as developing and testing better ones."

The findings are the latest from REMAP-CAP (Randomized, Embedded, Multifactorial, Adaptive Platform Trial for Community-Acquired Pneumonia), which has enrolled thousands of patients in hundreds of hospitals around the world to quickly determine what COVID-19 treatments work best in which patients. To date, more than 400 UPMC patients have been enrolled. Among its discoveries, REMAP-CAP has shown that inexpensive steroids are effective in helping critically ill patients, while blood thinners help the moderately ill.

In the convalescent plasma trial, REMAP-CAP enrolled 2,011 adults hospitalized with severe COVID-19. They were randomized to either receive two units of convalescent plasma or no plasma and followed to see if the likelihood of surviving at least three weeks without needing organ support, such as a ventilator, differed based on whether they were treated or not.

The trial concluded for futility when enough data was collected to say with greater than 99% certainty that convalescent plasma did not help critically ill COVID-19 patients.

However, the results followed a slightly different pattern for the 126 patients who were immunocompromised. This group appeared to do slightly better with the convalescent plasma treatment compared to the standard treatment, but the number of patients was too small to make a definitive statement.

"It could be that patients with an impaired immune system, who are unable to mount an effective immune response, could still benefit from the antibodies present in blood plasma from COVID-recovered patients, especially early on in the illness," said corresponding author Lise Estcourt, M.D., a associate professor of hematology and transfusion medicine at the Oxford University's Radcliffe Department of Medicine and director of the U.K.'s National Health Service Blood and Transplant Clinical Trials Unit. "This is something that definitely warrants investigation."

The researchers could not determine why convalescent plasma did not improve outcomes in most critically ill patients.

"We speculate that it could be a combination of too few high-quality antibodies in the plasma and these patients being too far along in their illness with a run-away inflammatory immune response for those antibodies to turn the tide," said co-senior author Derek Angus, M.D., M.P.H., chief innovation officer at UPMC and chair of the Department of Critical Care Medicine at Pitt. "It is still possible that convalescent plasma helps people in earlier stages of illness, though it is likely not efficient to use given that monoclonal antibodies—which UPMC also is evaluating in our OPTIMISE-C19 adaptive trial—are such an effective treatment for early COVID-19."

  1. 1 Nature,11月10日,Initial whole-genome sequencing and analysis of the host genetic contribution to COVID-19 severity and susceptibility
  2. 2 11月10日_研究人员分析宿主基因对COVID-19严重程度和易感性的影响
  3. 3 11月11日_新冠药物Remestemcel-L二期临床的中期分析结果积极
  4. 4 11月11日_CDC呼吁制定通用口罩规定以减少新冠传播
  5. 5 SSRN,2月20日,Dynamics of the Latest 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease Epidemic in China: A Descriptive Study
  6. 6 SSRN,2月20日,Mental Health Problems and Social Media Exposure During COVID-19 Outbreak
  7. 7 SSRN,2月20日,Evaluating Incidence and Impact Estimates of the Coronavirus Outbreak from Official and Non-Official Chinese Data Sources
  8. 8 SSRN,2月20日,Clinical Characteristics and Treatment of Patients Infected with COVID-19 in Shishou, China
  9. 9 Nature,11月10日,Mobility network models of COVID-19 explain inequities and inform reopening
  10. 10 1月27日_Nature报道中国新型冠状病毒最新研究进展:病毒传播速度有多快?
  1. 1 11月22日_感染无害冠状病毒可增强针对SARS-CoV-2的免疫力
  2. 2 Medicalxpress,11月22日,Population impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants with enhanced transmissibility and/or partial immune escape
  3. 3 11月22日_科学家开发出一种可同时测量针对SARS-CoV-2的 T细胞和抗体反应的方法
  4. 4 Medicalxpress,11月22日,Pfizer says COVID shot 100% effective in adolescents after 4 months
  5. 5 11月18日_传播性增强和/或部分免疫逃逸的SARS-CoV-2变体对人群的影响
  6. 6 11月22日_辉瑞的COVID-19疫苗在接种4个月后对青少年的有效率为100%
  7. 7 Medicalxpress,11月18日,Simple, synthetic structure that mimics surface of SARS-CoV-2 mounts robust immune response in mice
  8. 8 11月18日_模拟SARS-CoV-2表面的简单合成结构在小鼠体内引发强大的免疫反应
  9. 9 11月17日_Zosano宣布在其微针贴片系统上成功配制COVID-19候选疫苗
  10. 10 11月18日_新分析预测疫苗针对SARS-CoV-2的保护作用