Correction to: Nature Immunology 10.1038/s41590-021-00975-5, published online 26 July 2021

In the originally published version of this Article, there were errors in Fig. 6b, main text and Extended Data Fig. 8a caption.

Specifically, in Fig. 6b, the labels at top of the heatmap, now reading left-to-right as “REC-TEX” and “TEX,” were in reverse order. In the Results section, under heading “Epigenetic scars in REC-TEX limit core memory circuits,” second paragraph, fourth sentence, the text now reading “Of the 140 OCRs that were more accessible in REC-TEX compared to TMEM and TEX (Fig. 5c), only a handful (for example, Zfp36l2) showed increased expression of the associated gene in REC-TEX compared to TEX (Extended Data Fig. 8a)” overwrote the previous sentence (Of the 140 OCRs that were more accessible in REC-TEX compared to TMEM (Fig. 5c), only a handful (for example, Zfp362) showed increased expression of the associated gene (Extended Data Fig. 8a)). In Extended Data Fig. 8a caption, the sentence now reading “Genes from scRNAseq with significantly different expression between REC-TEX and TEX that are associated with more accessible OCRs in REC-TEX compared to both TEX and TMEM” overwrote the previous caption (a, Genes from scRNAseq with significantly different expression between REC-TEX and TMEM that also had associated significant differences in the chromatin accessibility).

The changes have been made to the online version of the Article.